Kolkata,
Sept. 14 -
The Jute Manufacturers Development Council (JMDC)
today claimed a major victory for the ailing jute industry stating that
it had succeeded in fighting and obtaining a revocation of a UK- based
firms patent for use of hessian cloth to cover waste and dumping grounds.
JMDC sources said that with the help of the former Indian Jute Mills
Association chairman, Mr. Sanjay Kajaria, it had succeeded in preventing
what could have been another loss for the country after foreign firms
had obtained patents for basmati rice, haldi (turmeric) and neem.
According to a JMDC press release a British company, Geohess, received
the European patent under the head of invention for use of hessian cloth
which gave it exclusive rights in almost all European countries and
it charged 60 per cent royalty.
The patent was challenged jointly by The IJMA, JMDC and Indian Jute
Industries Research Association after they learnt from a firm that it
was billed by Geohese to pay royalty for using hessian cloth for covering
waste, the source said.
After a keenly contested opposition proceeding
in the European Patent Office, a 13 August order in favour of JMDC revoked
the grant thus making use of hessian for waste cover available free
of monopoly, adds PTI.
The move augured well for the jute industry, which was now expecting
to register a sharp jump in export because of the revocation of the
patent and recent grant of DEPB benefit, industry sources added.
Geohess, taking advantage of global environment concerns and anticipating
a huge market demand for biodegradable covers for waste filed an application
in 1994 claiming novelty and inventive merits in use of hessian, a variety
of jute cloth. The provisional patent right on pending European patent
applications allowed in some EU countries enabled Geohess patent in
Europe.
Geohess exclusively sold about 4.5 million sqm of hessian for use as
covers for waste and dumping grounds and about 1.1 million sqm as grant
of license, though the patent was initially granted on June 1999. JMDC
in consultation with the Patent Attorneys, S.
Majumdar & Co. and their associate Attorney in the UK,
Roberts & Co., challenged the Geohess patent on grounds of lack
of novelty and lack of inventive merits.